Thanks for your question, Hoping.
Here’s what some of the Advocates say:
-
I’ve seen this in forming communities, one person in a couple more active than the other…and it’s not uncommon for that couple to drop out. Both being engaged seems important for connections to grow. The question is how to engage the less interested partner. Their having to meet requirements sounds like a way to lessen interest even more!
-
We’ve seen these mixed feelings in couples too. One couple dropped out, but with another, the “reluctant” partner got more engaged and they are both active members now.
-
In our community, every person is asked to attend plenary meetings plus the meetings of one other circle. The work share requirement is separate from this. Our expectations apply to each person rather than to couples or households.
-
Same with our community. We require every person to participate in two circles… and wish there was another, more flexible way to invite responsibility and ensure engagement.
-
In the early stages of our recruitment, we had a requirement for participation in two work circles, but as we filled up, that requirement became more relaxed. Now, some new associates don’t even participate in one circle! That’s not what we hoped for, so let’s hear more about how the “reluctant” partner got more engaged…
Do you have thoughts about this? Please reply here.
Are you a member of an intentional community and have questions and experiences you’d like to share? Come to our next Advocates Community of Practice gathering on May 8th.