How can sociocracy contribute to a systemic change?

Sociocracy, also known as dynamic governance, is a decision-making and governance method that can contribute to systemic change in several ways:

  1. Empowering individuals and groups:

Sociocracy emphasizes equal participation and consent-based decision-making. It provides a framework where individuals and groups have a voice in decision-making processes. This empowerment can lead to increased engagement, ownership, and accountability, fostering a culture of active participation and collaboration. By valuing diverse perspectives and ensuring that decisions are made collectively, sociocracy promotes inclusivity and can help challenge hierarchical power structures.

  1. Distributed authority and decision-making:

Sociocracy promotes the distribution of authority throughout an organization or community. Power is decentralized, and decisions are made at the most appropriate level, taking into account the expertise and knowledge of those affected. This can help to break down top-down decision-making processes and foster a more inclusive and responsive environment. By distributing decision-making authority, sociocracy enables greater autonomy, creativity, and adaptability within systems.

  1. Feedback loops and continuous improvement:

Sociocracy emphasizes the use of feedback loops to continuously evaluate and improve decision-making processes. Regular evaluations and assessments provide opportunities for reflection, learning, and adaptation. This iterative approach can lead to systemic change by identifying areas for improvement and enabling adjustments to systems and structures based on real-time feedback. Sociocracy encourages a culture of learning and adaptability, which is essential for systemic change.

  1. Consent-based decision-making:

Sociocracy uses consent-based decision-making, where decisions are made if there are no reasoned objections. This approach values both efficiency and inclusivity. By seeking consent rather than unanimity, sociocracy allows decisions to move forward while ensuring that the concerns and perspectives of all stakeholders are considered. This can help address power imbalances and facilitate collaboration, leading to more effective and sustainable solutions.

  1. Organizational and community resilience:

Sociocracy promotes transparency, accountability, and clear roles and responsibilities within organizations or communities. By providing a clear governance structure, it helps build resilience and adaptability. Sociocracy encourages open communication, trust, and cooperation, which are important for navigating complex challenges and adapting to changing circumstances. By fostering resilience at the organizational or community level, sociocracy contributes to systemic change by enabling long-term sustainability and adaptability.

It’s important to note that while sociocracy can contribute to systemic change, it is just one approach among many.

Achieving systemic change often requires a combination of diverse strategies, approaches, and stakeholders working together to address complex issues.

If you want to share your personal reflections on this topic, please feel free to do so in a comment below. Thank you.

Best wishes!


  1. Start here:

  2. Sociocracy – basic concepts and principles:

  3. Why Sociocracy For All (SoFA)?

  4. Social Justice Statement of Sociocracy For All:

  5. Sociocracy For All in the news

  6. Sociocracy basic resources

  7. SoFA Membership - Why join Sociocracy For All?

  8. Sociocracy Training

  9. More sociocracy resources: articles and videos

  10. SoFA events

  11. Many Voices One Song – A sociocracy manual

  12. Who Decides Who Decides? - How to start a group so everyone can have a voice!

  13. Let’s decide together - The definitive guidebook for practicing decision-making with children

  14. Meeting Evaluation Cards - This is the Meeting Evaluation Cards product by Sociocracy For All

  15. Case studies

1 Like

Hello Adrian,

Thank you for your concise argumentation around this essential subject !

Depending on the people we are communicating with, some specific arguments can be used, highlighting a key difference of sociocracy with more common ideas and practices.

For example :

  • We cannot delete power from the world, but we can change the rules of how it works.

  • To have a clear method like sociocracy is not a prison, it is a common ground to build together in an equitable way, without dependency to some visionary leader to guide us, and also without expectation on everyone to be all the time with a nice and conscious behavior.

  • Sociocracy is not about improving economic performance for the benefit of company’s owners : it is about building self-governed companies that are connected to their environment without predation nor domination.

Do you have other ideas around key aspects of sociocracy that can change people’s mind on the way to change social systems that controls our lives ?

Thomas (France)