If every organization were sociocratic... - what would change?

I need your help in thinking something through.

Let’s make it a little thought experiment. Let’s say, in your state, town or country, a mystery happens over night, and all organizations are sociocratic the next morning. Not only that, but people have been trained and everything works swimmingly.

What would happen next?

I’ll try to give a few answers, but really, I’m curious what you would predict. So here are three of my ideas:

  • Learning power-within. I think people would heal their issues with power. There is so much power-over and power-under (overstepping power vs. not using the power we’ve been given to work proactively and constructively) that we’ve internalized. Practicing sociocracy means to work through that - which can take years. But eventually, in more and more moments, we learn to hold our power in a healthy way. In a way that neither gives power and agency away.
    Working through this is not a matter of “learning.” It’s a transformational change that happens by experiencing, together, in real life - until the re-wriring in our brains happens.
  • Meeting needs. I think we’d see more needs addressed. With everyone having more governance literacy, we’d have an easier time organizing. The path from seeing a need to meeting that need would be shorter.
  • Weaving of community. Meetings wouldn’t be separate from community building. In fact, meetings would be prime places for building of community. Through listening, learning and shared exploration, we’d form a more coherent common ground of lived experience, shared vision and mutual understanding.

What jumps out at you? What do you think this world would look like?

In my opinion, you’re reversing conditions and effects. Sociocracy as a series of values and processes could help, but the preconditions are what you’re listing as effects: self-awareness, starting from individual and collective needs, and weaving a community, as a common ground, a common understanding of things, a common language, a common shared journey, based on acting more than on writing a clear aim (the aim is what you create doing).
This is what I learned from your latest writings and webinars, and it explains what I experienced every day since I started practicing sociocracy.

I don’t think it divides as easily into cause and effect.

Sure. It is more like: you can build a healthy organization without sociocracy and sociocracy isn’t sufficient to build a healthy organization. Sociocracy is more like a catalyst.

I find that well put!

I think we’d see positive health outcomes! Fewer chronic stress and isolation related illnesses. Connected, supported people live longer and have better quality of life.