In sociocracy, being different is "good" or "bad"?

adrian.zarif · July 30, 2023, 10:06am

In sociocracy, being different is “good” or “bad”?

In sociocracy, being different is generally considered a valuable and positive aspect of the decision-making process.

Sociocracy, also known as dynamic governance, is a method of governance that emphasizes consent-based decision-making, effective communication, and the empowerment of all members within an organization or community. In this context, being different is seen as an opportunity to foster creativity, collaboration, and innovation.

Here’s why being different is often seen as good in sociocracy:

Consent Decision-Making:

In sociocracy, decisions are made based on consent, not consensus. This means that as long as a proposal does not cause harm or conflict with the organization’s overall aims, it can be adopted, even if some members may have differing opinions. Embracing and integrating diverse viewpoints ensures that decisions are thoroughly considered and have a broad range of perspectives.

Double-Linking and Cross-Functioning Teams:

Sociocracy encourages a flexible organizational structure with double-linking and cross-functioning teams. Double-linking enables two people to have fully membership and decision rights in both, the parent circle and the child circle. This two people named “links” will participate in both the parent and child circle meetings, fostering information sharing, collaboration, and coordination across the organization. This open flow of information allows for the incorporation of diverse ideas and expertise.

Effectiveness and Adaptability:

Sociocracy aims to be an efficient and adaptable system. By valuing diverse perspectives, organizations can make more informed decisions and respond effectively to changing circumstances and challenges.

Empowerment and Engagement:

In sociocracy, every member’s voice is heard and valued. By acknowledging and appreciating differences, individuals feel empowered and engaged in the decision-making process, leading to increased commitment and dedication to the organization’s goals.

Continuous Improvement:

Sociocracy embraces the concept of continuous improvement through regular evaluations and feedback loops. By welcoming different viewpoints, organizations can identify areas for improvement and find creative solutions to enhance their functioning.

However, i**t’s essential to note that while being different is generally seen as an asset in sociocracy, it doesn’t mean that all differences will automatically be celebrated without any challenges**.

Differences can still lead to conflicts or misunderstandings, and effective communication and facilitation skills are crucial in ensuring that these differences are constructively addressed.

In summary, sociocracy views being different as a positive and beneficial aspect, providing opportunities for growth, creativity, and adaptability within organizations.

Embracing diversity of thought and experience is central to the success of sociocracy in creating dynamic, resilient, and harmonious communities or organizations.

If you want to share your personal reflections on this topic, please feel free to do so in a comment below. Thank you.

Best wishes!

Resources: