Typical objections will be based on lack of experience, lack of time, lack of trust.
Here’s a list of the different options, following the ACT frameworks in Let’s Decide Together: amend, concern, term.
It’s the facilitator’s decision whether to stick with the proposed candidate – especially if many people nominated the candidate – and make the proposal safer (by providing training, clearer expectations, by freeing up time), or to propose a different candidate.
-
Amend the proposal. Depending on what the objection is, there could be different options.
Examples
Objection: “I think I/the candidate doesn’t have enough experience” → can we get that person more experience somehow? Training? Coaching?
Objection: “I think I/the candidate doesn’t have enough free attention or time” → can that person give up other roles or tasks and get freed up for this role? -
Measure the concern.
Examples:
Objection: “I think I/the candidate doesn’t have enough experience and will run overtime a lot” → can we track whether the meetings run overtime a lot. How often would that need to happen so we review our decision?
Objection: “I think I/the candidate doesn’t have enough free attention or time and might drop tasks or forget to prepare the agenda” → How often would that need to happen so we would say it’s not working and we need to review this choice? - Shorten the term. Can we reach consent if the candidate stays in the role for a shorter period of time?
- Propose a different candidate
For more information, check out our handbook Many Voices One Song section 3.6.3