What sociocracy would become without sharing power?

Sharing power is a fundamental principle of sociocracy. Without sharing power, sociocracy would lose its core essence and transformative potential.

Here are some potential consequences of a lack of power-sharing in sociocracy:

  1. Centralization of Power:

Without sharing power, decision-making authority would be concentrated in the hands of a few individuals or a central authority. This can lead to hierarchical structures and top-down decision-making processes, where the perspectives and contributions of others may be disregarded or undervalued. It limits the ability of individuals to actively participate and influence the direction of the organization or community.

  1. Lack of Inclusivity and Participation:

Sharing power ensures that all members of the organization or community have a voice and influence in decision-making processes. Without power-sharing, marginalized voices and diverse perspectives may be excluded or ignored. This can lead to a lack of inclusivity, reduced engagement, and limited participation from those who do not hold formal positions of authority.

  1. Decreased Ownership and Engagement:

When power is not shared, individuals may feel a diminished sense of ownership and engagement in the organization or community. They may perceive their contributions as insignificant or irrelevant, leading to disengagement and reduced motivation to actively participate and contribute their skills and energy.

  1. Limited Innovation and Creativity:

Power-sharing fosters an environment where diverse ideas and perspectives are valued and integrated into decision-making processes. Without this, innovation and creativity may suffer. When power is concentrated in a few individuals, there may be a lack of exposure to different viewpoints and a reduced ability to explore and experiment with new ideas, hindering the organization’s ability to adapt and innovate.

  1. Diminished Trust and Collaboration:

Sharing power builds trust and fosters collaboration among members of an organization or community. When power is not shared, trust can be eroded, as individuals may feel that their interests are not being considered or that decisions are being imposed upon them. Collaboration and cooperation may suffer, leading to silos, conflict, and a breakdown of effective teamwork.

  1. Stagnation and Resistance to Change:

Sociocracy encourages continuous improvement and adaptability. Without power-sharing, organizations or communities may become resistant to change and innovation. The concentration of power can create a sense of complacency or an unwillingness to challenge existing structures and practices, hindering the organization’s ability to evolve and respond to changing needs and circumstances.

In summary, power-sharing is integral to sociocracy’s aim of creating participatory, inclusive, and effective decision-making processes.

Without power-sharing, sociocracy would lose its transformative potential, leading to centralized authority, reduced participation, limited innovation, and decreased engagement.


  1. Start here:

  2. Sociocracy – basic concepts and principles:

  3. Why Sociocracy For All (SoFA)?

  4. Social Justice Statement of Sociocracy For All:

  5. Sociocracy For All in the news

  6. Sociocracy basic resources

  7. SoFA Membership - Why join Sociocracy For All?

  8. Sociocracy Training

  9. More sociocracy resources: articles and videos

  10. SoFA events

  11. Many Voices One Song – A sociocracy manual

  12. Who Decides Who Decides? - How to start a group so everyone can have a voice!

  13. Let’s decide together - The definitive guidebook for practicing decision-making with children

  14. Meeting Evaluation Cards - This is the Meeting Evaluation Cards product by Sociocracy For All

  15. Case studies

1 Like